Friday 16 December 2022

Astro-Acupuncturist Interview

 



An interview between Chinese Medical acupuncturist and astrologist Samuel Dudgeon and myself. We thought this interview had gone missing so we were really pleased that it turned up again

Here is part one of the interview/podcast.

Monday 14 November 2022

AMISH INQUISITION PODCAST

 


Recently on The Amish Inquisition podcast which was great fun and really enjoyed talking with Phil, Ben and Matt. We veered away from the acupuncture and orgone research and ended up discussing AI, God, universal intelligence and radioactivity! See here (4) Orgones, Consciousness and AI - Leon Southgate : 257 - YouTube

Ambient Piano and Orgonomy 3 - An Orgonomic Theory of Time



This has been a really tough one, I never knew time was such a difficult and complex subject. I've got a working draft of it now, An Orgonomic Theory of Time, and it includes pretty much an aspect of every major time theory but from an orgonomic perspective. I'll publish the whole paper soon but for now, here is the third part of the Ambient Piano and Orgonomy series where I discuss the basics of it. (6) Ambient Piano and Orgonomy 3 - YouTube (6) Ambient Piano a

Friday 21 October 2022

LINKS AND STUFF

 As my website not up at the moment here is a list of the links to various aspects of my work and research. You can find my old website, orgonecontinuum.org, on the wayback machine, but am hoping to launch a new one before too long,


Blog - this links through to my email from the comments section if you want to get in touch: https://leonsouthgate.blogspot.com/ or direct to email Leonsouthgate@gmail.com

Journal - Journal of Psychiatric Orgone Therapy (US) main place for my recent papers, use the search function and my name for full list of papers or scroll through sections: https://www.psychorgone.com/



Annotated Bibliography Book (free to download) - https://www.smashwords.com/books/view/213413

Facebook group (shared). Search for, Orgonomic Science, Consciousness and Spirituality group

Monday 5 September 2022

Ambient Piano and Orgonomy #2

My second one in this series, based on my Dad's Jazz and Psychoanalysis - ambient improvisation and chat on AI, consciousness, physicality vs spirituality, orgone and Hegel. We mention people like Charles Tart, the hypnotherapy experimentalist, philosophers like Rene Guenon and Hegel and reference my paper on orgone and philosophy - The Orgone Continuum | The Journal of Psychiatric Orgone Therapy (psychorgone.com)




Wednesday 24 August 2022

New Video Series - Ambient Piano and Orgonomy.

I haven't done a video blog for a long time, my last series was the Orgone Continuum TV Series where I did a video version of my main research papers published at the Journal of Psychiatric Orgone Therapy at www.psychorgone.com. I've got a new series which is going to be more informal discussing any ideas or theories I come across from an orgonomic and consciousness perspective. I will also discuss ideas in my latest papers which aren't in the Orgone Continuum TV series, such as this latest one on AI, Consciousness and Intelligence from an orgonomic perspective - Assessing the Existence of Deep Artificial Intelligence from an Orgonomic Perspective | The Journal of Psychiatric Orgone Therapy (psychorgone.com) My next one in this new series will be about AI, Consciousness, Intelligence and so on (the last two concepts are often confused I've found). All Best, I hope you enjoy this new series. By the way, I've based this concept, live music and theoretical discussion on my Dad's very sucessful conference in the early 80s - Jazz and Psychoanalysis. I will post up a copy of the poster soon it was so popular it kept getting nicked for display in student's digs I imagine.


CLICK on LINK Below to Watch:

(1) Ambient Piano and Orgonomy - YouTube

Thursday 18 August 2022

Discontent and its Civilisation?


In what way are we as a species different from animals? It is given lip-service in our society that a human is just another form of animal, albeit a special one, but people do not really believe that. Some say that both evolutionary and religious theory accords us a special place. One way or another we are at the top of the tree psychologically speaking. Either we are God’s most special creation or we are the end result of blind processes that somehow triumphs in the human (despite the protestations against specialness of the Neo-Darwinists). Either way most people still believe that humans are somehow different from our animal brethren. Perhaps we are. But if that is indeed the case then what makes us uniquely different?

The main question I would also like to ask in this essay is:

Are we civilised or just domesticated? 

I think this is an important question. One that Orwell perhaps hinted at. Perhaps the book, ‘Animal Farm’ was more than just an allegory of how a socialist society may go awry. Perhaps society actually is a farm. A humenero as someone once put it.


Domesticated Humans





But before we can get to those questions let us first examine if humans are different to animals, and if so, in what way.

Are Humans Different to Animals?

What makes us uniquely human? Not much it appears. Some within certain religious groups might argue that humans have a soul whereas animals might not. But what evidences the existence of a soul in a human? If it is our emotions then that is not unique to humans. Animals display the full range of emotions and tendencies as humans, from happiness to anger, jealousy to pride, grief to love. Parrots get very emotionally attached and can die of heart-break if their beloved human passes away first or emigrates without them, as has been known from various cases (1). A paraquet is a small parrot-like bird and one would not expect them to have an uncannily human-like range of emotions. I inherited a paraquet and it has become quite attached to myself. It thinks it is my partner and gets annoyed if someone pays me attention in front of it. It enjoys snuggling into my chest whilst I watch a documentary or video. Talking of which dogs and cats can enjoy watching videos but usually they don’t.

Humans and animals have similar recreational needs. Young animals like to play like young humans. Most animals don’t like music with repetitive beats however many dogs and cats will listen to quiet classical music. There is an exception, again parrots which both enjoy music with a beat and will dance to it too.

What about language, surely that makes us unique? Animals have vocal and body languages but they can also use systems similar to our own abstract systems, albeit to different extents. Are we the only one to use abstract symbols? Apparently not. Dogs can recognise abstract symbols and use dozens of words. It is said by animal psychics that animals communicate mostly in pictures and telepathically (2). This form of communication has been evidenced and seems surprisingly consistent. It does not mean that animals cannot use symbols. It is seen that dogs and other animals can use human created symbols and understand their meaning but animals also create their own. Weaver birds, with tremendous effort create beautiful nests, the design of which represents their skill and their ability in life. The mate chooses her partner on the basis of the skill in presenting a unique nest (3). The puffer fish creates abstract art, we could say that this done solely for attracting a mate but how many human artists gain emotionally or socially from doing their art in addition to any intrinsic enjoyment? Certainly the abstract forms themselves are both symbolic and artistic (4) and the puffer fish may well enjoy the process.

Puffer Fish - Symbolic, Abstract Artists



Ants can farm/enslave aphids, some species of weaver birds build apartment blocks of nests, bees live in hyper-social super structures, lions live in feudalistic prides. Some animals have a degree of democracy, certainly there is much politics in a group of monkeys. Other animals seem to have achieved an almost ideal level of positive anarchy where everything functions well but no one is in overall charge. This can be seen in a flock of birds which swoops and turns in unison but with no conductor or the virtually telepathic, decentralised anarcho-communism of bees and ants.

Democracy, even different forms of democracy like representative can be noted (female lions approving the male leader in block ‘votes’) to direct democracy (herd animals making decisions based on a level of consensus above a certain percentage). Such democratic patterns are even seen in insects and less social animals like pigeons (5). Like humans some animals prefer to be on their own in the wilderness – the rugged individualist. Even capitalism and private property exists in nature, animals are territorial, plants own their spaces, social and material capital is accumulated, a hunting ground is a form of capital.

We are finding that intelligence is much broader than we ever imagined, everything from a slime-mould to fish have complex intelligent behaviours. So it is not intelligence that makes us unique, our machines are already more intelligent than we are in certain areas. Could it be our capacity for good and evil? Again here it is a no too. Animals will sacrifice themselves for their young, they will look after siblings of another species, they will go without to feed their offspring. On the other side, lions will slowly eat an elephant alive and killer whales will wear down their prey over days of pursuit, yes they are driven by hunger but the process is still torturous to the victim. Cats will purposefully maim. Most humans are driven to evil by things seemingly beyond their control at the time too. Like animals we become victims of our own drives and reactions. Dolphins, seals, lions and even ducks can practise behaviour which most would class as evil, beyond what is needed for survival and catching prey. Animal behaviour, in all our worst traits, except perhaps large scale organised war are seen in the animal kingdom (6).


Good and Evil in Ducks



Even our sexuality is in no way unique. Animals can enjoy sex, they have strong sexual drives and a certain percentage are gay and bisexual depending on the species. Different family forms are also practised by various species particularly birds. The homosexual behaviour is not on the whole just replacement behaviour as in certain bored captive animals, much of it is genuinely gay and seen in the wild, some species even are preferentially gay but not many (7).

 

Gay Animals, Diverse Families



The author’s contention therefore is that humans are not in any way unique, we are an exaggeration and a generalisation perhaps. But beyond that not different in kind. We are a very strange animal though in some ways. We sweat and are mostly naked like a sea mammal, so can run for very long distances as we can keep cool. Very few other mammals sweat like we do. Other creatures make tools but we have exaggerated this ability. We seem to have a digestive system that is neither herbivore nor carnivore, having teeth that are mostly herbivore but the oversized brain and small guts of a carnivore. We are closest to a pig and a capuchin monkey in the dietary regard, not at all like most primates. We seem to have averaged out the opposing ends of the dietary spectrum just as we are a generalist in other ways. We are also strange in that we appear not that well suited to our surroundings physically and need to use tools, cook and build complex shelters just to survive in most habitats.

Discontent and its 'Civilisation'

By culture we tend to mean a society’s set of beliefs and ways of living. It is often used in an interchangeable way with the word, ‘civilisation’. Civilisation most basically defined is just living in a city type structure but usually it is more broadly defined around a set of factors generally implying what is considered a developed society: a political state, social classes, urbanisation, work specialisation and writing being central characteristics. On the other hand, a farm is defined as an area of land used to grow crops or raise livestock, usually as a business.

We undoubtedly have many of the characteristics of so-called civilisation but is all as it seems?  We have a political state but it is often not of our making. Most people do not live in the kind of state they would choose. The people they do want as leaders get assassinated and those they don’t want put in their place. We do not control the actions of the states we live under. The state decides when to go to war not the people. The state decides what economic system will be in use and who will benefit the most from it, not so much the people. You vote for a conservative party with traditional values and get globalism. Or you vote for a labour party for the working class but get globalism too. Unless you live in China, where you might be able to influence local politics but get a national technocracy. In Africa, leaders who go against the wishes of globalism get their countries invaded or their presidents assassinated. We are not in control. Certainly, through great resistance and in parts of the world where we are fortunate enough not to be too amenable to the imposition of empire, such as Europe, with its dividing seas and mountains and local lords, people have been able to gain some level of freedom over the centuries through protest, turmoil, civil war and civil disobedience but it is constantly worn down and tampered with, reengineered until nothing of the original impetus is left. If the British people were in control of their state, we would have a genuinely conservative government not the communist one we see, we'd have a young King and his mother would be the pre-eminent royal - Princess Diana who would be married to a Muslim with a mixed lineage of descendents. Instead we had a horrible sacrifice and a Royal family that most thinking British wouldn't give tuppence for, not that our opinion means anything.

There are certainly classes in existence so this might make us a civilisation but who in our society wants such huge differences between the elites and the rest of us? Who wants an underclass who can’t afford food? No one does except the controllers. Hunger is not accidental, technology and the means to provide for everyone is systematically destroyed. Even our most basic technologies could provide for everyone, let alone the suppressed technologies. All these things are not accidental, they are built into the system. Disturb the balance of the system and it tries to destroy that trigger.

Urbanisation is a central part of civilisation and yes we have that but who amongst us would choose to live in an atomised city, wouldn’t we rather be living in small communities which join together into larger ones forming a community of tribes in an area or a humanised city? Do we want to live in soulless connurbations? We live like farm animals facing the feeding/transport troughs rather than each other. We are a tribal, herd animal so why are we forced to live such lonely, mass-produced lives? It is not of our choosing. We have below an idyllic - supposedly, set of houses facing a river in a northern country. The houses don’t face each other as in a small self-contained community but look out onto the thoroughfare like in a farm.

 

Farm Housing





In a farm the power supplies are centralised. In our so-called civilisation power supply is also centralised. We have had inventor after inventor who provides ways for decentralised power production and decentralised transport but each time they get killed or suppressed. Our society is held back by hundreds of years by evil schemes. But why do the evil ones always have the upper hand? It is almost as though there is a rule that humans in ‘civilisation’ most not get beyond a certain point, the point where they would cease to be intelligent farm animals. Technology is only allowed if it centralises and creates power for the few and whoever sits behind them. Decentralising, humanising, empowering, healthy technology is killed. Centralising, power creating, dehumanising, rapacious technology is enshrined to be worshipped whilst the susceptible are brainwashed into thinking it ‘green’ and somehow good.

Farms are pan-opticons. The farmer wants to be able to view all his livestock at once. Our societies are organised in the same way and are fast becoming technocratic pan-opticons. Our schools and offices are the same.

Perhaps a high population was needed to enter through the industrial revolution but now that has been achieved the high population is surplus to requirements. We are without a shadow of a doubt being culled, right now. I am writing this in the summer of 2022. Every week at least a thousand excess deaths are occuring in the UK according to official statistics. Young celebrities and athletes continue to get ill and die. But no one connects any of this with the dreaded 'V' word - verboten in the media-feed prepared for the docile farm animals. The 'health' war continues unabated whilst we wait for the next phase of the war on the population.

Closing the Karmic Loophole

Is there anyone to blame for the current situation? There used to be a sense that although planet Earth appears to often feel like a prison for some of us it can be argued karmically, that consciously or unconsciously, we all agreed to be here through our actions. So, it is our responsibility that we are here. This then justifies the traumas experienced in this earthly realm and even may put a sense that outsiders need not interfere too much - yes, it is bad, but the people agreed to it on some level.

But is this actually true? If we do not live in a civilisation of our choosing but a human farm imposed upon us, then we can ask:

Are sheep responsible for their own slaughter?

Are cattle to blame for their own captivity?

On a farm it would seem to be the farmer who is responsible. The farmer moulded those creatures so they could not think for themselves. Or if they still had some freedom of mind, imprisoned their bodies. In reminds me of the great film, ‘The Day The Earth Stood Still’ from 1951, Wilhelm Reich’s favourite movie. In the film, Klaatu is mystified at why cows don’t leave their fields, they are intelligent enough to make their way into the milking parlours so why do they not just unlatch the field gates and leave? They are trained to think the way the farmer wants them to think. They are not free in their minds.

 

Reich’s Favourite Movie



In the same way humans have been moulded and altered, until spiritually, they are no longer what they were before this process. Most humans are not fully acting as humans anymore but as farmed creatures. Therefore, our controllers, whoever they really are, could be argued to be karmically responsible for what has befallen us and for what is now stopping some of us truly being human. A farmed animal cannot be blamed for its living conditions, or its lack of free thought. The cow has been manipulated to not be able to see the latch on the field gate, it cannot think beyond the milking parlour or the cattle shed. Even if it can vaguely see there is a better life than this it is too fearful or too comfortably numb to take action. The runaway sheep tends to just get run over or end up lost and hungry.

That part of humanity which is still fully human chooses not to live as we do. That part which is no longer able to function is perhaps not as responsible as we may think for the world as we see it now. The controllers made that portion of humanity into cattle so perhaps they carry that karma. Any bad karma of the inmates has already been repaid in the suffering of being a farmed animal, it could be said.   

So What To Do?

One thing we can do is try and minimise the suffering created by other creatures within the multilevel farm we exist within – the ‘farmed farmers farming the farmed’ is what we humans are currently. We can avoid factory farmed meat whenever we can. If we do not want to be unhappy cattle we should not impose it on other creatures. Most people want other animals to live as good a life as we can make it, whether they eat meat or not. We can decentralise and become responsible for ourselves in small little ways, like collecting rainwater and purifying it or starting a vegetable patch, or even just growing some cress on a windowsill. We can try and connect to people in our communities and form work and housing cooperatives. We can start moving toward living in tribes again. In the meantime we can join a local ‘tribe’ whether it is a gardening club, a golfing club, a local football team or a farm direct scheme. Any way we can move away from centralisation is required. We can set up our own healthcare systems on a small scale and start to rethink how we live in atomised separate houses. We can stop using the globalist system as much as we can, using cash instead of cards, getting away from mobile technology overdependence. We can find alternative commerce schemes and get creative again. We are going to need as much community as possible to get through the collapse of the centralised system that appears to be on the horizon.

The most important thing we can do though is spiritual, energetic. We can imagine the world we want to live in. We can start to feel its reality in our meditations. We can dream again. We can reawaken to our own innate power as the creators.

References

1 https://www.barkinganddagenhampost.co.uk/news/parrot-dies-of-broken-heart-7653550

2. Anna Breytenbach, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rQehXoCipts

3. https://thekidshouldseethis.com/post/weaverbirds-nests

4. Yoji Ookata https://twistedsifter.com/2012/09/fish-creates-beautiful-sand-art-to-attract-females/

5. https://www.biologicaldiversity.org/news/center/articles/2012/mother-nature-network-11-04-2012.html

6. https://listverse.com/2016/11/14/10-animal-behaviors-that-mimic-many-of-the-worst-behaviors-in-humans/

7. Bagamihl, B. (2000) Biological Exuberence, Homosexuality and Diversity, Stonewall, UK. 



















Friday 12 August 2022

Exosomal and Reich's Bion Processes:
Are They the Same?

Exosomes, Non-organic Exosomes, Bions and 'Viruses'







Firstly as my old website is down and new one not up yet, here is a link to my Annotated Bibliography on Post-Reich Orgone Journals - a cross referenced 347 page book that came from a first year of a PhD at Bolton University (the rest is on hold currently). The book is free and great thing about Smashwords is you don't even need an account to download:


There is a huge debate between those in the truth movement like Dr Lanka and Dr Kaufman and conventional microbiology. Between what is called Terrain theory, originating with Bechamp and Germ theory which was credited to Pasteur. The former says ones own body creates most microorganisms and occasionally will get rid of a unhealthy balance of toxins. It emphasises internal terrain and doesn't see viruses as coming from outside the body. Germ theory is the opposite and as it is much more in tune with the control and profiting from humanity rather than helping them, the latter is of course the dominant narrative up till recently.

The reason for adding this blog post today is because I realised this week, after a researcher published this great new article on bions and blood breakdown:


that a major area of Terrain theory is missing from the discussion:

THERE ARE NON-BIOLOGICALLY DERIVED EXOSOMES TOO - BIONS FROM TREATED MATTER.

In other words when any matter breaks down, inside or outside the body micro-cellular, pre-cell, proteinoid vesicles, that appear to be alive are formed. Basically when anything is cooked, pasteurised even, at very high temperatures these tiny vesicles are formed. Reich called them bions.

Any material will become pre-cellular exosomes (or bions as Wilhelm Reich called them) when material is superheated in water. The exosomal/bion process also happens to any internal biological cellular structure which is stressed too as the terrain researchers have noted already. I am a researcher myself and have seen these processes in a lab in UK.

Bions from an iron filling - showing exosomal process in non-living matter:


Another lab, same thing:


There's about another 6 doctors over the last century discovered the same thing as Reich giving them different names, microzymas, proteinoid microspheres, cell-wall deficient forms, pleomorphic virus/bacteria, somatids, protids, jeewanu, Rife's 'cancer virus', Reich's T-Baccili 'virus' - all likely bionously/exosomally produced micro-cells that appear in different situations of health or illness, all consistent with terrain theory. Only Reich as far as I remember showed how they are produced from non-living matter as well.

MAINSTREAM SCIENCE HAS BEEN SUPPRESSING THAT VIRAL STRUCTURES SHOW UP IN CANCER TUMOURS

This is because mainstream science is dogmatically and vehemantly against abiogenesis and biogenesis (creation of living entities from non-living or living matter respectively) and if 'viruses' (really exosomes/bions) get created within degenerating tumour tissue this evidences biogenesis so its hushed up as 'pre-existing viral genetic codes getting activated' - gobbledegook in other words, because the truth is uncomfortable - dying big cells create new smaller living structures - the exosomal-bion process.

THE EXOSOMAL PROCESS IS THE SAME AS THE BIONOUS PROCESS OF REICH

So to help researchers I've extracted the subject chapters in Section 2, on Bions and on Cancer from my Annotated Review (the latest evidence isn't in this review, go to www.psychorgone.com and the Annals of Orgonomy journal The Institute for Orgonomic Science for latest papers on bions, Reich blood tests, orgonomy and cancer and so on).

To get the full reference, including details of the journal you will need to download the full copy which is free. Smashwords – Annotated Bibliography of Orgonomic Journals – a book by Leon Southgate

The first number below is the Bibliography Item Number in Section 1. The second number here after the bracket is the page of the journal that the synopsis refers to. So to find full reference go to Section 1 of the full Bibliography and find the relevent number. The first one here would be 212. Then scroll back in the synopses to find the journal that 212 was from. Then look at pp197 if you have a hard copy of the journal. Reading this below though will give a good idea of the research up until the late 90s I think. The formatting doesn't carry across very well but hopefully you'll get an idea of the research available.

Just as a last note I've been wondering for years which came first, Reich looking at degenerating grass or Reich cooking foodstuffs and examining them under microscope (in the discovery of bions). According to the great orgonomist Blasband, it was the latter, I reminded myself going through my notes and rereading his article in Journal of Orgonomy, 1973, V7 N1 pp31. After confirming the four-beat Orgasm or Life Formula bio-electrically (Mechanical TENSION, bioelectric CHARGE, energetic DISCHARGE, mechancial RELAXATION, Reich being unhappy with the narrative in microbiology about abiogenesis being impossible (all cells ONLY from a cell) he noted that all living things pulsate according to his life formula. So he reasoned all living things need food so lets look at food and take it from there. He found all food breaks down into pulsating, glowing microstructures which are then eaten. Later he came to know these structures from breaking down grass then eventually from breaking down sand (a fortuitous accident). The sand vesicles also had a very strong radiation - the start of the orgone energy journey that was to take him to the stars eventually (figuratively speaking, though the Space-gun, a radioactive cloudbuster was his last invention to harness the orgone and could reach the atmosphere, perhaps space itself). Anyway, a lot happens when you follow a thread and don't give up. Its a hard path though for which Reich gave his life - literally.

From Annotated Bibliography

BIONS
212) 197 Medical/Orgone Psychiatric Therapy-Patient probably had bionous disintegration of epithelial lining of lungs resulting in constant infections. (Bions are proto-cellular organisms smaller than microbes formed in certain circumstances from disintegrating matter, known as bio-genesis. They were discovered by Reich. (Other researchers have found similar entities). 224) 31 Classical Medical theory gets in difficulties with the viral findings in cancer. Cancer is riddled with viruses but in order to avoid the logical conclusion: that the body can produce viruses when tissues break down, the story that viruses live in cells from before birth and are then activated had to be put forward. (It is also noted in this paper that Kaplan and Gross had induced the formation of lymphoma-type viruses purely from radiation in 1969). 225) 4-32 Bions - One of the clearest articles within orgonomy on the development and whole issue of bions and their evolution (by Reich). Comparative sizes of bions and bacilli - 22. Ernst Haeckel-a little known biologist who also discovered bion-like forms (with a somewhat mystical interpretation according to this article) - 32. 284) 21-22 Org-protozoa (protozoa developed from bion processes). Named after the orgasm formula. Bions are 'magnetically' attracted into the 'mouth' of the org-protozoa. The org-protozoa will only readily grow from dying grass. 285) 22 T-baccilli only grow in a low energy environment. 324) 35 Procedure for time-lapse micro-photography of Bions is described. Two to three pieces of moss or grass placed on a hanging drop slide, water added. Piece of wax placed under four corners of a cover slip which is placed over the slide to exclude air bubbles. Cover slip attached with paraffin to the two longer sides of the slide. One fourth of the slide cavity is not covered by the cover slip. Water is then pooled alongside the two sides not covered by the cover slip. Reservoirs replenished every two hours. Also see 556) for details of original technical equipment. 332) 156 Bions are preliminary not complete forms because they are hard to culture. (Later generations may be more complete or culturable-159). 333) 159 Four types of bion - round, long rods, cells with nuclei and amoeba-like. 334) 162 Bions and electricity Negative electrical charge appears essential for bion culturing - Reich. Bions from earth change from anode to cathode migration after galvanising at 5ma for 1 hour - 167. 368) 156 Swelling of particles can result in electrical charge. 374) 6 Reich's bion experiments used a process of pasteurisation to disprove pasteurisation! (Reich used only sterile materials superheated). 379) 14 Du Teil in his letter to the French Academy of Science requesting lab assistance to investigate Reich's claims, states that the bions would lead to a materialistic solution with life viewed as 'purposeful organisation' and assigned basically to the realm of mind. 557) 213 Bions can be... Seen clearly at 2000x with apochromatic objectives, are vesicular, have a bluish glimmer, are surrounded by a white halo, show internal and whole pulsation, can move, fuse, divide, immobilise bacteria, are Gram positive, stain blue with hematoxolin. (Reich also claimed to have cultured them but this hasn't been repeated). Contamination Objection Successive sterilisations using sealed glassware still shows the forms. Conversely unsterile technique results only in known forms of bacteria. Brownian movement Objection Some forms move actively whilst others in the same field do not. Forms will move continuously then suddenly stop. Stationary forms will suddenly start to move. Speed of movement is independent of the temperature of the medium. There is a tendency toward mutual attraction between the forms. 668) 69 Orgone Experiments Bions Carey, Dunlap A variety of substances used to prepare SAPA bions are described. Authors used Reich's original methods. Some good photographs presented. Table 2 used Orene, an orgone substance, as an added ingredient to the culturing medium. The cultures have some powerful subjective effects. Note also the increased breakdown of the cultures when kept near flourescent lights or smoke detectors in a city lab environment compared to a country location. 679) 224 Micro-biology, bions and pleomorphism - discoveries outside of orgonomy. Eusinophilic bodies described in Kaposi's sarcoma plus variety of bacterial cocci and minute rods may be bionous breakdown. Cantwell and Rowes micro-photographs show a resemblance to bionously disintegrating cancer tissue. 223-Livingstone and Jackson found a pleomorphic organism in various malignant tissues which they called a progenitor cryptocytes (0.2-0.5 microns-about virus particle size). Conventional biology may classify Reich’s T-baccili as a mycobacteria. T-baccili are a life-negative ultra-minute bion type associated with low energy charge and cancer. Mycobacteria have been found in AIDS tissues by Zakowski. 689) 13-25 Orgone Experiments Reich Blood Test (RBT) and radiation victims Blasband et al. Study confirmed broad aspects of Reich's blood test. The correlations were better at extreme ends of scale; very energy deficient or energy excess, but in general there is a definite correspondence between clinical picture and Reich blood test results. There were three groups in the study, normal controls, radiation exposed, radiation exposed with cancer. Gross appearance of blood (centre size, appearance, number of bions - small or centrally located was noted. Breakdown rate of blood cells in saline at 5, 10, 15, 20 minutes was recorded. The autoclavation test was performed. This is a stress test where blood is combined with KCL and boullion, autoclaved and measured macroscopically and microscopically for cohesiveness and breakdown of structure. The study had a relatively good number of participants, 55 and the T-Test showed a significant difference between radiation and radiation group with cancer (P=0.01) - see footnote to chart - 21. The table indicates that the difference between normals and radiation group might have been statistically significant if tested in a larger study. Bion formation rates show a clear difference between the three groups though this is not statistically analysed. Reich's red centres and blurred inner membranes were not seen. Also present day conditions might be one of chronic oranur overcharge - bion breakdown rates have become much slower than in the 1950's. Perhaps Reich was seeing an acute radiation picture. RBT has been useful for detecting extremes of bioenergetic charge-14. The normals were often somewhat undercharged too (which would skew the results against statistical significance). Very good description of RBT - visual, destructive, culturing (for bacteria) this latter part of test had to be abandoned in this study. Cancer state was populated by an increasing number of subjects with low charged, distorted cells more rapidly breaking down into small bions - 24. Out of the 16 non-radiation controls only 7 subjects could be considered healthy. Most had medium charge and some structural deficits. THis could be an indication of our oranur atmosphere - 25. Synposis of earlier Baker RBT study-17. 704) 126 3 www.leonsouthgate.com Bions and Bechamp Bechamp discovered role of moulds in fermentation before Pasteur. He discovered 'Microzymas' - subcellular entities. Bechamp believed microzymas might be involved in the formation of chromosomes and DNA - 127. Bechamp viewed the microzymas as physiologically indestructible - living in chalk from previous ages - 127. Bions Bions take up the Giemsa bio stain and range from 2 to 10u in size-128. Bions can get smaller as they age becoming bacteria and eventually T-Bacilli at about 0.2u - 128-9. T-Baccilli Some immune stimulating effects of T-bacilli are also possible. Grad has noted upward evolvement of T-baccilli. 737) 201 Classical misinterpretation of cancer bions eg Russel Bodies and other large forms and ‘nuclear debris’ etc. Role of Cell Wall Deficient Forms in cancer not explored fully. 756) 34 Immune system functions before structuralisation: pathogenic organisms cannot survive near to highly charged bions or blood. Red blood cells (RBC) can kill pathogenic organisms simply by their energy charge. RBC can mobilise T-Baccilli (tiny cancer-associated vesicles) at a distance. T-Baccilli can also evolve upwards into PA (packet) bions. Function determines structure (multishape antibodies are an example of this). 1030) 58 Fox, S. Dose, K. (1977) Molecular Evolution and the Origin of Life, NY, Marcel Dekker. Another case of the careful editing out of Reich's work. Fox presents 2 decades of careful well researched evidence and arguments for the existence of 'proteinoid microspheres'. These are formed through cooking a mixture of amino acids. These spontaneously form polymers and micro-particles. Boiling saline is added and spheres a few microns in diameter are formed with various proto-cell characteristics such as gram-staining, electrical activity, excitability, informational molecule exchange. They call their view on life origins as 'constructionist'. The parallels to bion formation are overwhelming but amazingly Reich is not mentioned. 227) 31 Reich's Bion experiments started with cooking food and examining it microscopically. (Hypothesis - all organisms derive life energy from food). Blasband. 13) 30 Reich produced a slow motion picture bion movie/film of cancer cells being produced from low charged living tissue-this was a spectacular feat of technicality alone for 1939. 283) 21 Reich's bion micro-photographic film equipment Specially built Reichert microscope with magnification up to 5,200x. Microscope lamps. Speed adjustable Kodak movie camera. Timer allowing 120 frames per second to 1 frame per ten hours (normal speed 8 frames per sec). Equipment allowed bion development of one month to be shown in ten seconds. 232) 23 Comparative sizes, bions, T-bacilli, microbes are detailed. See other notes for details for example 742). 379) 14 Du Teil in his letter to the French Academy of Science requesting lab assistance to investigate Reich's claims, states that the bions would lead to a materialistic solution with life viewed as 'purposeful organisation' and assigned basically to the realm of mind. 387) 111-112 Around 1960 Fox and other scientists discovered that heating amino acids to high temperature and then placing them in boiling saline resulted in formation of 'proteinoid microspheres'. These exhibit life like properties-motility, budding, cleavage, growth, membrane selectivity and 'primitive' proliferation. Two particles could form junctions (similar to Reich's radiating bridges). Fox believes that such protocells are precursors to cells and are the basic unit of life. Makes no reference to Reich or bions. See International Society for the Study of the Origin of Life. Fox, S. and Dose, K. (1972) Molecular Evolution and the Origin of Life, USA, W. H. Freeman. 557) 213 Bions can be... Seen clearly at 2000x with apochromatic objectives, are vesicular, have a bluish glimmer, are surrounded by a white halo, show internal and whole pulsation, can move, fuse, divide, immobilise bacteria, are Gram positive, stain blue with hematoxolin (Reich also claimed to have cultured them but this hasn't been repeated). Contamination? Successive sterilisations using sealed glassware still shows the forms. Conversely unsterile technique results only in known forms of bacteria. Brownian movement? Some forms move actively others in the same field do not. forms will move continously then suddenly stop. stationary forms will suddenly start to move. Speed of movement is independent of the temperature of the medium. There is a tendency toward mutual attraction between the forms.
CANCER
102) 206 Similarity between colitus and cancer-both are self-protection (from bionous breakdown of cells). Colitus uses high lumination and inflammation (over-charge). Colitus directs energy away from genitals. 224) 31 Classical Medical theory gets in difficulties with the viral findings in cancer. Cancer is riddled with viruses but in order to avoid the logical conclusion: that the body can produce viruses when tissues break down, the story that viruses live in cells from before birth and are then activated had to be put forward. (It is also noted in this paper that Kaplan and Gross had induced the formation of lymphoma-type viruses purely from radiation in 1969). 237) 81-84 Orgone Experiment. ORAC Mice. Only 9 animals. Used transplanted tumours. Strong ORACs. Rural location. Clear weather. Results There was a significant difference in longevity. The Treated group lived 1.6 times longer. Statistics - TTest, P=0.05. (My Note: the results may be more significant than the above because of difficulty obtaining significance in such a small group size). Autopsy results are particularly graphic and support the statistical significance. Control mice have dirty, degraded internals but Treatment mice look clean internally. There was a delayed tumour take-up in the Treatment group mice. Blasband. 239) 119 Reich's priority in illuminating cancer’s links to emotional disposition (particularly resignation). 267) 12 Reich saw the cancer cell as a protozoan that develops out of oxygen starved, immoblised body tissue. 285) 22 T-baccilli only grow in a low energy environment. 296) 173-180 Orgone Experimental Study DOR-buster in the treatment of Cancer Mice Blasband, R. Controlled study. Transplanted mammary tumours were used. Treatment lengthened life span by 1/3rd in treated mice. The size of this change would most likely be statistically significant with a better sample size (but was not reported to statistically significant here). Delay in tumour development was a strong variable. The groups were a little small (N=14) to justify a full statistical analysis. Mice in the Treatment group were much healthier and lively than those in the Control group. Conclusion Overall a good study, reported in detail, which showed a real effect by the DOR-buster on cancer affected mice. 326) 81-89 Orgone Experiment Cancer Mice - Orgonotic Functions in the Solunar Cycle. Blasband, Ganz and Konia It was hypothesised that solunar peaks of activity would increase the intensity of the ORAC’s effects. Treatment in the solunar phases delayed acceptence of transplanted tumours. Although there were 38 mice in this study no statistical analysis was attempted. There were 14 in the ORAC solunar group and similar numbers in the ORAC non-solunar group and Control group. Results Low levels of ORAC charging may worsen outcome and increase tumour size. It might be too weak a charge to stimulate immune system sufficiently. In both the solunar and non-solunar mice groups once acceptance of tumour was complete further charging increased tumour size. Blasband reported similar problems in medical DorBuster paper (1974). The study used transplanted tumours which is an artificial situation medically. Reich used spontaneously occurring tumours which showed an inhibition of tumour size throughout ORAC treatment. Perhaps investigation of a solunar effect is somewhat ambitious at this stage, however this study did show what appears to be an objective effect on tumours via the ORAC. 457) 211 People today have no conception of what is good or evil, or what is health-they can see raving madness or a carcinoma, but lack any awareness of emotional barrenness, resignation, or the existence of a shrinking biopathy. 490) 27 Eva Reich used an accumulator funnel on a woman with terminal cancer of the breast in an hospice (with permission from the chief doctor, Dr Nagler from philiadelphia). After two weeks the tumour softened and became delineated from the surrounding tissue. Dr Nagier became frightened and asked Dr Reich to stop. 560) 218 Cancer/Reich Blood Test Bright energy field around Red Blood Cell cannot be an artifact as the field pulsates. 623) 64-65 Reich’s view of the cancer cell is fundamentally divergent from the mainstream. Generally the cancer cell is seen simply as an ‘aberrant’ type of normal cell. Reich’s view is that it is a fundamentally different type of cell from the normal with a completely different genesis (i.e. bionous breakdown and subsequent reorganisation at a lower level). All biopathies (Reich’s term for a holistic disease pattern), but most especially cancer, show the following: 

Wednesday 27 July 2022

NUCLEAR OR UNCLEAR?


Introduction

The following post is included, as although not directly about orgone and consciousness, orgone enters a state of excited and different activity when stimulated by radioactivity. Therefore radioactivity is an area of interest to this researcher. Further, because we are in such a critical situation politically the author felt questions needed to be addressed quickly. Due to events happening so fast this essay has been published now but if things need revising in it that will be done as soon as inaccuracies or omissions are brought to my attention. My personal website is no longer up and running so this blog is in use again. My main papers can always be viewed at the Journal of Psychiatric Orgone Therapy at www.psychorgone.com. 

In normal times I would wait many months to digest and assimilate new information before analysing and compiling it, but here I felt I had to share before I have completely made my own mind up about it. Why, will become clear. 

We are presently in a situation of conflict between NATO and Russia. Up until recently direct confrontation has apparently been staved off through the prospect of the so-called MAD doctrine - Mutually Assured Destruction. This is based on the idea that nuclear weapons can destroy whole cities in one go and that no one can win a nuclear war, but..

 Are Nuclear Weapons All That We've Been Told?

It was becoming obvious that NATO was not worried about starting a confrontation with Russia. In fact, it seemed like they were doing everything they could to start a war - not supporting the Minsk agreements in Ukraine, assisting an anti-Russian coup in Ukraine, ignoring the internal war against ethnic Russians amongst others. This got the author thinking that they are preparing for a full-scale ground war with NATO troops openly involved and are not bothered about the possible use of nuclear weapons. This could either be because they are happy to sacrifice large areas of Europe and perhaps the US. Or alternatively it could be that they do not themselves fear nuclear weapons. Is this because they do not work as claimed? This does not mean there could not be some other type of catastrophic weapon, perhaps a Directed Energy Weapon or a Tsunami creating device. But perhaps nuclear arms do not work as we have been taught. Certainly, by NATO’s behaviour one would think a nuclear war is the last thing on their minds. Paradoxically, they seem to have deep faith in Putin not to start a nuclear war. Unless of course, nukes are real, and NATO is run by psychopaths.

One can start with the first major event most think of as definitive proof of atomic weapons – Hiroshima. A US Airforce expert working for the government of occupation in Japan found, much to his surprise, that many concrete buildings in central Hiroshima were still standing and even fragile structures were still extant. The damage was not unlike what he had seen in other Japanese cities, many of which had been destroyed. Major Alexander Seversky said, ‘Hiroshima looked exactly like all the other burned out cities in Japan..I saw the buildings structurally intact and what is more topped by undamaged flagpoles..I could find no traces of unusual phenomena.’

 

 

Major Seversky Confirms No Unusual Damage

 

 



 

A doctor Cole Sims who was also on the ground in Hiroshima shortly after the bombing stated in a 1979 interview that he was ordered to exaggerate the devastation of the atom bomb by a US government worried about maintaining a deterrent threat.

 

There are also reports that the number of bomber planes sent out shortly before Hiroshima did not completely tally with official reports - 111 bombers being sent to a relatively small oil refinery and another 66 to attack a small town which then reported relatively low casualties according to the following researcher. Such numbers were in excess of what was needed for the stated missions and left plenty to attack somewhere else. This research was based on extensive reading of book and military reports of the bomber accounts before Hiroshima and Nagasaki (1). Most of the pilots need not have even known where they were attacking, apart from the lead bomber.

 

Nuclear energy itself, though probably quite real, is also not what we are told. Here is a summary of Galen Windsor, a renowned early nuclear power station scientist who was the leader in his field at the time. He has consistently made several unusual claims which do not tally with the mainstream narrative:

 

Galen Windsor, Nuclear Power Station Scientist




(2).

 

The claim that the second world war could not have been ended had there not been use of atomic weapons (without massive loss of American military lives and Japanese to an invasion) is contradicted by widespread US intelligence intercepts indicating that even before the huge and repeated carpet bombing of Tokyo (resulting in many tens of thousands of deaths and the levelling of Tokyo). The Japanese military were already prepared to accept surrender under similar conditions to that taken after Hiroshima and Nagasaki were levelled. General Macarthur also had documented surrender overtures from high level Japanese government officials, which he gave to the US President before the Yalta heads of allied states meeting in January and prior to the claimed atomic bombings of August 6th and 9th 1945. See minute 19 approximately for copies of documents (3). Some concrete buildings only a few blocks from Ground Zero survived structurally intact, counter to what we are told about the city being completely incinerated.

 

Hiroshima Building 1945 and Presently




 

(5). Hiroshima had normal radiation levels within hours – this was explained by US military as the effects of wind and rain and because the explosion was apparently air detonated. But shouldn’t an air detonation create more damage and after-effects and not less? Rebuilding started right away in Hiroshima. Today it is thriving with normal levels of health for its citizens. Chernobyl is now a sanctuary for wildlife. With all the nuclear tests carried out should not the planet be half-dead and radioactive everywhere? The largest explosion in history was not the super-bombs of the USA and USSR but the Krakatoa Eruption, which was 4 times more powerful than anything even claimed by the superpowers. Certainly there are widespread reports of immune system disorders in children following nuclear accidents such as Chernobyl but perhaps the full story is yet to come out. Even early nuclear tests did not create lasting radiological evidence.

 

Chernobyl Wildlife




Regarding the Fukushima accident in March 2011, this author was in touch with the orgone scientist Dr Demeo who confirmed that no unusual radioactivity was picked up on the West coast of the USA where he has his research station. Fukushima was the only power station (out of the many that is said to supply Japan with a third of its power) that was not immediately shut down following the earthquake. Despite this shutdown and the loss of power from Fukushima there was no power outages in Tokyo that year. Fukushima power station area is being reinhabited and the power station is now reopened with tourism recommencing and residents moving back. Does this all add up? Weren’t we told that radioactivity contaminates for centuries?

 

The author of this last video referenced (5) believes that nuclear energy is also faked. This author does not concur with this for several reasons. Geiger counts react to radioactivity which certainly seems real – radioactivity can be recorded easily. The oranur effects of radioactivity can be felt in the body and recognised. The author has measured various environments and materials which correspond normally to their expected radioactivity counts. Radioactivity is just charged, excited particles leaving matter and converted into something we can hear or count - hence radio-activity. A geiger counter tube reacts to the charged particles hitting it from uranium or other radioactive material or from a concentration of excited orgone energy (oranur). Wilhelm Reich experienced very high Geiger counts. This was in his orgone versus nuclear energy experiments (oranur). He did this without lasting ill effect. The nuclear scientist Galen Windsor also experienced very high Geiger counts without negative effect. Some of the Geiger counts Reich experienced could be expected theoretically only in the core of a nuclear plant. Yet he was fine.

 

Perhaps nuclear energy production works but in a more orgonomic way than we are told. The author does not think there is unlimited power in a nucleus or in matter as the equation E = mc2 might imply. Rather the power might come from the surrounding aether/orgone field around the matter. If nuclear bombs can be made to work then the author now thinks it is likely they are an explosion/ignition of the aether/orgone itself. Something that is likely to be incredibly difficult to produce. In a sense conventional theory aligns with this to some degree, stating that a chain reaction occurs within the atoms of the plutonium or uranium spreading out until it reaches a criticality resulting in an expansive explosion. The author believes that Windsor is honest. He believed that nuclear energy was real, and although he said he had handled nuclear rods with his bare hands once they were cool, he contended that there was nothing remarkable about nuclear energy, it was just a cheap and ‘good way to boil water’ (6). Which is essentially correct this author believes (also a very effective way to excite orgone energy or life-force). Uranium and plutonium are very reactive, radioactive and in the right concentrations, explosive materials. But gunpowder is also explosive and very reactive, that doesn’t mean that Krakatoa can be copied using just gunpowder. Galen says he walked around with sub-critical quantities of plutonium in his lab coat pockets - but he never detonated the research facilities. In the 1980s we were told that minute amounts of plutonium could kill everyone on Earth – this is obviously false. The Nagasaki bomb was said to have pounds of the stuff in its core, today the city is fine.

 

Perhaps the huge nuclear power plants do not make the amount of energy claimed. James Demeo, a research scientist, worked out that conventional nuclear power plants cost more to run than they might output in energy once all the conventional energy inputs and disposal are accounted. Galen was convinced that nuclear energy has ability to be downscaled to a more decentralised structure. He thought used uranium and plutonium, as long as it is kept at below the fissile concentration (about 5% for plutonium), can be stored above ground if kept dry and can be simply air-cooled in warehouses. It is also a lot more reusable than we are told – there is really no such thing as high-level nuclear waste as the metals therein are highly valuable. Low level waste Galen believes is a complete scam and isn't actually dangerous but presently can be used to dispose of anything that powerful entities would want to hide. So to keep the social power structures the way they are, decentralised, cheap nuclear power could not be allowed. Galen believed that mass produced mini nuclear plants could allow for energy independence of cities and towns – our capitalo-communist masters could never allow this. Uranium that was reusable was reclassified as high-level nuclear waste in 1982 by Congress. President Carter would not allow plutonium to be shipped to India but did allow uranium – which could make a better fissile source in any case according to Galen. None of it appears to make sense. Having expensive, centralised power stations is hugely profitable and an endless source of taxpayer largesse to a criminal energy cartel. The nuclear waste disposal systems, apart from being a gravy train financially, could be used nefariously too he thought – no one is going to examine low level nuclear waste too closely to see what it really contains.

 

The other thing that does not quite add up is the reports of the Manhatten Project’s fantastic success. In all the development of the uranium bomb, plutonium bomb and the hydrogen bomb (the size of a warehouse) only one person got seriously affected and virtually all the tests and then the early usage went ahead perfectly. This is just unbelievable if the claims made are true. As for the claims that it cannot be faked because people worked on it and have direct experience it must be remembered that everything was compartmentalised, one group had no idea what the others were doing. During bomb tests most looked at the ground or through thick goggles and had no way of directly judging what was going on. Unedited footage is rare or unavailable. Those that happened to dismiss protocol and look at the tests suffered no ill effects. Plutonium core pieces were secretly carried to construction sites near Japan in ordinary backpacks according to the scientists involved such as Raemer Schrieber – see reference below. The actual bombs themselves were incredibly crude. A uranium or atom bomb is just a tube with two pieces of enriched uranium fired at each other. A plutonium bomb, such as said to be used at Nagasaki, is just a sphere of plutonium surrounded by explosives designed to implode upon the sphere. Virtually all tests and all usage of the devices went perfectly we are told. This is just not believable. Real science does not run without problems like a fairy tale (7). Others have noted that comparative explosions of huge amounts of conventional materials were stacked near the early atom bomb test sites, the soldiers being told they were for comparative analysis (8).

 

Certainly, plutonium and enriched uranium are fissile and explosive when at a critical mass, but below that mass can be safely stored. Galen states he used to walk around with half a critical mass of plutonium in each pocket. He says the huge shielding walls were originally put in place when the critical mass was not yet known – not for radiation protection as such. Galen recounts that according to Los Alamos document 36/11, plutonium criticality has accidentally been reached 34 times in early US nuclear power plants with explosions that cost 8 lives (9). Explosions are preceded by the air turning an orgonotic blue. But levelling a city with 2 and half kilos of plutonium would be fantastically expensive (if it is possible). It is obvious that the same effects occurred in Tokyo where similar numbers died using a few hundred B52 bombers and conventional, much cheaper munitions. Tokyo was devastated and looked similar to Hiroshima and Nagasaki. Economically the atomic bomb does not stack up well – 8 early nuclear reactors and tens of millions of dollars to produce the same effects as a squadron of B52s can achieve?

 

Galen also thought that the Three Mile Island (TMI) incident did not occur as stated and that the reactor could have been switched back on almost immediately. This was done to maintain the fear status of nuclear power and thus justify the huge spends on it, However, the effects of radioactivity leaks from large plants and the effects or reality of nuclear weapons are separate issues, whatever the situation with TMI.

 

Slow motion replay of the 1950s test reels shows buildings that do look like models if seen closely. Also, we are repeatedly shown, to emotive music and solemn voice-overs, buildings, cars and trees being swept away – but where were the cameras? How come there is no camera wobble? Were super reinforced concrete bunkers made for the filming? On one 1950s movie reel the scientists are shown on the other side of a bunker watching a blast. But the camera shot was taken from just outside the bunker! Even if the cameras were shielded and fully automated the film itself would likely be damaged. If a moon landing can be faked in 1969 then bomb footage can certainly be faked in the 1940s.

 

 

Models in 1950s Movie Reels







 

In the above pictures model use can be seen. The first shows a farmhouse which is swept away in one go by the atom blast – but where is the camera? Why is it not swept away too? The second shows a clip from a series of angles taken of different trees which are said to be the same set of trees. These are then swept and blasted away. But again where is the camera? Also this particular shot apparently uses model trees interspersed with real trees (10). The author has seen other footage which shows warehouse type buildings with perfectly similar windows and edges, looking, in slow motion much like a model. The US military had its own Hollywood style film production studios called Lookout Mountain. There are images that appear composite, like two bomb plumes combined into one mushroom cloud, or the use of the sun as a background as the explosion, even an apparently cardboard cut-out can be seen as the background of a test explosion. It should also be noted that mushroom clouds are not unique to atomic explosions and huge explosions have been created with hyperbaric or thermobaric vacuum bombs. Some aerial videos of Hiroshima appear to show two mushroom clouds that are seen as one from the main angle.

 

Comparative explosions before the claimed nuclear tests were carried out using tonnes of explosives in the early part of May 1945 – an orange fireball could be seen 60 miles away. Radioactive isotopes were mixed in with the explosion to test the effects of radioactivity spread. As the procedure was already in place it would not be hard to have a huge explosion created by conventional munitions in place at a nuclear test without raising suspicions. Curiously, there was also only limited reports of radioactivity following the actual nuclear test explosions. Fermi, one of the leading scientists of the Manhatten Project did not get to see Ground Zero of the test site – his tank broke down apparently. Perhaps Fermi could not be trusted not to disclose what he would see (11).

 

Positive Evidence

 

The author tried to find definitive evidence that nuclear weapons are real. However, even seismic evidence for assessing whether test ban treaties are adhered to are not always reliable. Underground testing was instigated from the 1960s onwards. When a bomb is detonated underground it can have specific effects on seismic readings however distinguishing seismic bomb data from natural activity in the 1950s data might be somewhat difficult if it is available.

 

There was an extensive report by doctors and scientists on the fall-out from the Marshall Island nuclear tests (12). The fall-out victims from the Marshall Island nuclear tests were fewer in number than the author expected. Thyroid nodules did develop in inhabitants but not until many years after the explosions. However, a significantly higher incidence of thyroid cancers was found, 40% higher than a comparative population. The report concluded that food ingestion was the main source of radioactive contamination, and that skin exposure was not significant due to washing.

 

Levels of radioactive isotopes such as Carbon14 have been thought to have risen sharply for some years worldwide at the peak of nuclear testing and then fallen again to normal levels since the peak in the 1950s (13). Geological stations reported seismic evidence in the range of a small earthquake after a North Korean bomb test (5.6 magnitude). Kim Jong Un is pictured below with a device claimed to be a hydrogen bomb warhead. In the 1950s, the USA needed a whole warehouse to house one of these but now it is claimed to be in a clean, missile mountable small steel unit which looks a little like a takeaway vent-shaft (14).

 

North Korean Hydrogen Bomb Warhead

 

 

 

It is recognised that smaller nuclear detonations below ground are not always easy to monitor (15). The difference between earthquakes and explosions has been studied in recent years but using conventional explosives (16). Seismology, hydroacoustics, radionucleotide monitoring and GPS monitoring of particle densities are methods used to help detect nuclear explosions now. But large explosions above ground ceased by the early 1960s so confirmation data from back then is limited (17). The US is said to have attempted making large craters for mining with a nuclear device and the USSR was said to have had an extensive programme of using similar devices for creating lakes (18) (19). However huge explosions are possible by other means than nuclear.  Nuclear Electro-Magnetic pulses are reported to occur after large nuclear explosions in the atmosphere and EMP weapons have been claimed to be tested by both the US and USSR. The evidence for EMP effects however are themselves fairly limited (20). Perhaps nuclear explosions are possible but are not as easy to produce as we are told. It could be that nuclear explosions occur but are exceedingly expensive and difficult to produce at will. As far as the definitive evidence that nuclear weapons are real and just as we are told the author has not yet been able to identify it.

 

A Fullfact article that claimed to debunk the notions that nuclear weapons are not real offered nothing in terms of actual scientific evidence for nuclear explosions but instead pointed to an article about survivors of the Hiroshima and Nagasaki bombings. In contradiction to their claims, the historical page they linked to points out that the US officials not only confiscated medical records of the survivors but completely censored any data and accounts of the people in the immediate aftermath of the terrible destruction of Hiroshima and Nagasaki. Complete control of information in Japan, including medical data, continued until the early 1950s (21). One survivor interview conducted when in his 80s is indeed a traumatic account. The injuries recounted are horrific but it is not indisputable from his account that it was an atomic bomb rather than napalm, a fire-storm blast or another type of bomb that caused the injuries. A sudden blast of fire-wind can be created by large incendiary fires in bombed cities.

 

James Demeo recounts evidence by Gould and Goldman that all-cause mortality rates increase after nuclear accidents and points to evidence that earthquakes might be linked to nuclear testing (22). However, the rises in mortality were relatively modest by today’s ‘health warfare’ standards and could be due to multiple environmental and living factors. Demeo also reviews the Petkau Effect by Graub and notes that low level nuclear radiation leaks have been associated with rises in various mortality causing diseases and likely damages plants and animals. However, low level nuclear radiation effects, whatever their reality, do not prove that nuclear weapons are real.

 

Certainly, if a nuclear explosion is really an orgone/aether explosion, the author would expect it to be, at the very least, very hard to produce such an effect. It seems strange that a global criminal cabal that has used Directed Energy Weapons without a shadow of doubt on 9/11 in my view (see Dr Judy Woods),  confirmed use of biological weapons on their own populations (biological spread tests and biological injections experiments on US and UK citizens), chemical weapons (confirmed in Vietnam unlike the fake claims in Syria against Russia), depleted uranium use (Iraq, elsewhere, tankbusting incendiarys existing since the late 1970s) and every kind of explosive is somehow going to refrain from using all but the lowest yield nukes and nothing since the end of WW2 out of the goodness of it's heart. No way. Either they can't use them or they're waiting to use them in a false flag shortly and don't want to preempt themselves. A third but unlikely option is they are already using low yield nukes - there is claims of atomic looking explosions perhaps in Syria.  In a video, an explosion lights up the night sky as daytime then two mushroom clouds are seen and then lastly the classic single nuclear looking mushroom cloud. However this could be pictures of a MOAB - a huge conventional bomb or a fuel air bomb or the images could be manipulated.


A last cautionary note would be that it may not be that hard to produce a fake nuclear explosion in a city and blame it on the enemy of choice – Orwell predicted that a single atomic bomb in a Western city preceded the imposition of the dystopian Ingsoc regime he prophetically described in the novel 1984. So if nuclear weapons are not real, they are not stopping a confrontation between NATO and Russia. Something else might be however. Or a ground war might be imminent.

 

In conclusion:

 

*There does not appear to be indisputable evidence nuclear bombs are real.

*Nuclear power may not work in the way the public is told.

*It is possible it could be harnessed much more cheaply.

*The evidence of nuclear explosions is much more limited than one would expect.

*There is however evidence of low-level nuclear radiation causing health problems.

*Information on Hiroshima, Nagasaki and other claimed atomic detonations are tightly controlled and censored.

*Models were likely used in the movie reels from the 1950s.

*Governments and corporations have much to gain from the present narrative as a dangerous energy source and as a super weapon: reasons for secrecy, intelligence operations legitimised, militarisation, endless budgets, intimidation of other countries, balance of power, maintainance of energy cartel, acquisition of materials falsely labelled 'waste', stop cheap energy.

*The project to create nuclear weapons went way too smoothly to be credible as told.

*The MAD doctrine has been successfully sold as keeping a world war from erupting - whether it actually has or not is unclear.

*It has also created enormous income streams for weapons manufacturers, energy companies and governments.

*The nuclear industry and nuclear waste industries have consumed spectacular amounts of resources dues to its perceived dangers whilst confiscating valuable product as ‘waste’.

*Nuclear weapons may work not on the principles we are told or perhaps not work at all.

*If they do work they might work on aether/orgone principles and be much bigger and/or harder to use.

*Governments recently seem to centre their entire policies on creating fear in their populations as means of coercion and control, nuclear power and weapons fits into this narrative well.

*Nuclear power and weapons have been a readily available and constant source of fear for populations. As long as smaller governments and people in general believe the weapons are real the effects are beneficial to the criminals.

*Belief in nuclear weapons helps keep the nuclear power industry expensive due to the public’s fear – an energy cartel is hugely profitable to the cartel and to centralised government.

*The perceived danger of radioactive materials prevents low-cost decentralised power supply from nuclear energy being harnessed.

*Suppressing the true facts on nuclear power keeps the public away from knowledge of oranur (which is created through nuclear interaction with life-force) and the aether (the banned medium from which particles arise - known to the Victorians and to Reich, Tesla and others but withheld from public knowledge since Einstein).

*Low level nuclear waste disposal could be used to get rid of the cartel’s criminal evidence.

*Run off from nuclear rods could be harnessed beneficially as a low level heat source.

PostScript 

Since writing this article I came across a first hand account, by the first Western journalist to go to Hiroshima, just under a month after the destruction - Wilfred Burchett (23). He sidelined the strict army censorship and restriction on movement imposed by General MacArthur and whilst a ceremony for the surrender was taking place elsewhere Burchett went off alone on the 2nd September 1945. He ignored reports that no railways were working and managed to travel to Hiroshima by train from Tokyo. Tokyo had mile after mile of complete devestation, concrete reduced to rubble, buildings gone in the smouldering ruins. He interviewed a Japanese journalist in Hiroshima, Mr Nakamura, who was in communication with Tokyo via morse code, presumably via radio. He reported that he was cycling to work as normal on the day of the attack - so this would counter arguments that Hiroshima had merely been firebombed. Burchett also reported that he was shown a river where many fish were dying due, it was thought, to radiation poisoning. He was shown many civilians in hospital who appeared to have radiation sickness and were dying, hair falling out, burns and immune problems according to Burchett's reports from the doctors. He was told that those who had dug in the rubble were worst affected. He also was surprised to find that concrete structures in the centre of the city had survived. He was told that this was because at the centre of the blast there was a cushioned zone (though this appears to be just a theory). The army contradicted his reports of fallout illness saying that radiation dispersed to normal quickly due to the airburst delivery of the bomb, however radiation levels at early test sites also dispersed to low levels quite quickly apparently, even when they were ground detonated. 

The US had a double propaganda interest in the narrative: on the one hand they would want to exxagerate the blast effects to increase deterrence and awe but also to downplay the after effects to minimise public criticism. The Soviet Union had told the US that Japan was ready to surrender prior to the attacks on Hiroshima and Nagasaki of 6th and 9th August. The USSR had also warned Japan directly that it would enter the war against it, 3 months prior, and did so on the 8th of August 1945 - a situation Japan would know would be impossible for it to counter effectively.

Radiation is reported to have dispersed to normal in the city, within weeks vegetation started returning and the rebuild process got underway. Many in the city who were there that day survived and went on to live normal healthy lives. However, many people in the city were likely malnourished and their immune systems would not be working normally, so the destruction of the city by whatever means would have polluted all nearby rivers with industrial and household toxins. The people would have been affected by burns, toxins and by smoke. It is also noted that most of Japan was kept off limits for journalists and this included Hiroshima. Burchett found a loophole that was closed immediately that the army heard of his travels (he got permission to go from the US Navy with which Burkett travelled to Japan). Tokyo, which suffered a similarly high level of loss to Nagasaki and Hiroshima through huge firebombing, the biggest ever in history, was also mostly off limits - journalists would not be able to compare damage to Hiroshima or interview survivors in the cities. Medical information was completely censored from Hiroshima and Nagasaki. It was reported to Burchett that there were two aircraft flying over the city of Hiroshima that morning of the 6th but they were assumed to be reconnasiance and not much attention was paid to them. Perhaps both planes carried super MOAB (Mother of All Bombs -  a huge conventional ordinance bomb) or large air fuel bombs (can create enormous devastation). Some reel footage appears to show two mushroom clouds from some angles. Or it could have been as stated by the conventional history.

It is a strange fact that thanks to the work of Dr Judy Wood in her groundbreaking forensic analysis (24) complete with thousands of unequivocal pictures and graph after graph that Directed Energy Weapons are actually better evidenced than nuclear weapons. There is no doubt whatsoever that DEWs are real and were used against the whole complex on 9/11 - not just Building 7 and the Towers. The whole complex was vapourised/dustified from above - this is outstandingly clear from photos and scientific evidence. On the other hand nuclear weapons are hard to find undeniable evidence for their reality, at least evidence that cannot be argued against in some way. For example the destruction of Hiroshima was equalled by Tokyo, horrific burns and poor healing, poisoned environments would have been common to all the cities attacked in WW2 in Japan. The US evidence for nuclear weapons, the movie reels and test data from the 1950s is not completely transparent nor is the seismic or medical evidence that I could find. It is possible to disperse radiological contamination or release deadly orgone energies without using an actual atomic bomb.


Dustification of Entire Site and Missing Debris




There are reports of possible ancient nuclear warfare in the Mahbarata, Bible and elsewhere.  

Some say high technology existed in ancient times. They point to the 'pillars of salt' story in the Bible (Lot's wife turning to ash) and the instant destruction of whole cities, 'Sodom and Gomorroh'. There is also evidence in deserts and some castles across Europe of the vitrification of sand and stone. City destroying weapons are described in the Mahabarata. Some of the examples pointed to, such as vitrication of stones on the outside of forts across Europe indicate a localised device, such as a mobile DEW might create. Large scale vitrifications of sand in the Middle East could again evidence a natural effect creating intense heat or DEWs or nuclear weapons. So the ancient evidence and description are not definitive either.

But what does all this mean? 

For a start we are definitely not being told the whole picture about nuclear energy and weapons. How could this be so? There is definitely an aether/orgone that interacts with nuclear energy to create new forms of energy, Reich called this resultant powerful motor and healing force, Oranur. This is most certainly real and suppressed and connected to nuclear energy. Reich evidenced this oranur energy beyond much doubt and I have personally repeated this evidence on a smaller scale (25). 

LENR - or Low Energy Nuclear Reactions are quite likely real too - so the physics we are told that nuclear reactions can only take place in conventional situations is not set in stone further evidencing an aether like medium interacting with matter. Galen's account that conventional nuclear energy could be utilised without centralisation and with huge benefits to people costwise could well be true too. There are so many benefits to the elite of the current nuclear narrative both economically, militarily and politically. Unlimited budgets, need for secrecy, centralised power supply, fear in the population, initimidation of other countries to name but a few. So we have the motive, we have unquestionable background of lying about aspects of nuclear energy and its interaction with the underlying continuum (aether/orgone) and we have doubts as to the veracity of what we are told.

I am not certain that nuclear weapons are not real in some way, I do not yet know enough about it to make up my mind for sure but it certainly is not crystal clear like the evidence for DEWs is in my view. Nuclear weapons could be real but much harder to use than we are told or they could be entirely fake, I do not know. The political certainties that nuclear weapons supplied - that one superpower would not attack another directly is also now questionable.

Bear in mind too George Orwell, who was privy to insider knowledge through his friend Aldous Huxley, wrote in his prophetic book '1984' that one of the West's cities was attacked with a nuclear weapon before the imposition of the tyranical Ingsoc regime (26). We are on the verge of tyranny now and a false flag attack could be carried out. We can't trust anything we are told - nuclear or unclear - it is a fitting anagram.

PostScript 2 (April 2023)

Back in the 1970s and 1980s we were told that plutonium and other nuclear materials were almost dangerous on a God-like level, small amounts could eradicate the entire planet. But this is completely untrue. People walked around with half an explosive amout of plutonium in each lab pocket (Galen Winsor). The materials for early Nuke bombs were secretly ferried around in back packs (see Shreiber documentary in References). The Queen neeeds referencing here. I came across a blog article about the Queen visiting the first Atomic research lab in the UK in the 50s. Apparently she was handed a lump of plutonium, probably worth tens of millions, so she could have a nice feel of the warm material. PPE? That's right, a plastic bag. I hardly believed the blog post so I found the original reference in the Chemistry society archives, as it might go walkies I took a screenshot which is reproduced below...



References


(1) https://rumble.com/v1ca603-the-nuclear-hoax-what-really-happened-to-hiroshima-and-nagasaki.html 15 minutes approx.

(2) https://rumble.com/vwywjj-nukes-are-fake-just-like-covid-19.html

(3) https://rumble.com/vwywjj-nukes-are-fake-just-like-covid-19.html 19:00 mins.

(4) https://rumble.com/vwywjj-nukes-are-fake-just-like-covid-19.html 22:33 mins.

(5) https://rumble.com/vwywjj-nukes-are-fake-just-like-covid-19.html 22:40 mins.

(6) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AMJO6dVTdP0 Galen Windsor: Early Nuclear Scientists - nuke stations are not functioning as we are told

(7) ‘The Half Life of Genius’ (Raemer Schreiber) (TV Documentary 2017).

(8) https://rumble.com/v15aepf-nuclear-hoax-nukes-do-not-exist.html 

(9) https://rumble.com/vx96gt-the-nuclear-hoax-nukes-do-not-exist.html See Galen clips last hour.

(10) https://rumble.com/v15aepf-nuclear-hoax-nukes-do-not-exist.html 9:00 mins approx.

(11) https://rumble.com/vx96gt-the-nuclear-hoax-nukes-do-not-exist.html

(12) https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc1089793/m2/1/high_res_d/5547703.pdf pp72

(13) https://www.ctbto.org/nuclear-testing/the-effects-of-nuclear-testing/general-overview-of-theeffects-of-nuclear-testing/

(14) https://nypost.com/2017/09/03/seismic-activity-detected-near-north-korea-nuclear-test-site/

(15) https://eos.org/articles/could-seismic-networks-reveal-hard-to-detect-nuclear-tests

(16) https://eos.org/articles/nuclear-bomb-or-earthquake-explosions-reveal-the-differences

(17) https://gizmodo.com/5-foolproof-methods-for-detecting-secret-nuclear-bomb-t-5882973

(18) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sedan_(nuclear_test)

(19) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chagan_(nuclear_test)

(20) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nuclear_electromagnetic_pulse

(21) https://www.atomicheritage.org/history/survivors-hiroshima-and-nagasaki#:~:text=%C2%A0-,Immediate%20Aftermath,-In%20the%20days

(22) Demeo, J (1993) Deadly Deceit – Book Review, Pulse of the Planet 4, pp 132

(23) Pilger, J (2005) Tell Me No Lies, Chap 2.

(24) Wood, J. (2010) Where Did The Towers Go, The New Investigation, US.

(25) Southgate, L. Preliminary Experiments with Electrical Capacitance, Temperature, Radioactivity, Luminesence and Other Observations associated with Controlled Oranur in a Strong Orgone Device | The Journal of Psychiatric Orgone Therapy (psychorgone.com)  https://www.psychorgone.com/orgone-biophysics/preliminary-experiments-with-electrical-capacitance-temperature-radioactivity-luminesence-and-other-observations-associated-with-controlled-oranur-in-a-strong-orgone-device

(26) Orwell, G. (1975) Nineteen Eighty Four, Penguin, UK (first pub 1949).

1)