In my recent reading I came across a new compound word. I like 'mechanical-ness' very much as a verb. Sometimes you see a person who is caught up in the system and you can predict their behaviour because they are following a programme. I like the word because it conveys both Mesmer and Reich's ideas on armouring. I also think a description I've heard of a 'computerised' society is very accurate. See here for further articles. This got me thinking about an observation I've made - every successful holistic practitioner appears to share something in common: they do a good deal of meditational work every day. Which is putting them in touch with 'presence', (in Mesmerism) or the 'force' (in Star Wars!) or being 'in contact' (Reich). The Mesmeric idea of presence, or Reich's conception of 'contact' is indeed at the foundation of successful medicine. Perhaps this is why no particular psychotherapy has ever come out on top - because it is the 'contactfulness' of the practitioner that is key rather than their theoretical background perhaps. On that note, I also must remark that sometimes orgone psychotherapists might consider that dearmouring is a continual lifelong process, especially in a society as armoured as our own. So even if a practitioner has done a deep and thorough dearmouring on themselves over the years they might still need to dearmour segments, every day even. This latter issue is something which Yoga emphasises well. Practically speaking there is much in common between yogic movement and breath work and the physical side of orgone psychotherapy. But before any orgonomic purists get upset let me point out that orgonomy emphasises the sexual stuckness and that I am not advocating a fusion of the two practices. Some pictures to illustrate mechanical-ness and the computerised society....
RESEARCH AREAS: Orgone, Oranur, Consciousness, AI, Philosophy. MAIN PAPERS at: Journal of Psychiatric Orgone Therapy www.psychorgone.com. COLLECTED WRITINGS VOL 1 EBOOK All my science work in one place (free) - https://www.mediafire.com/file/i4edclpwrgd2hfg/LeonCollectedWritingsVolumeOneJuly11th2023PDFCOPY.pdf/file ANNOTATED BIBLIO of Post-Reich Journals Ebook (free) https://www.smashwords.com/books/view/213413 EMAIL LeonOrgone12@proton.me
Tuesday 24 September 2013
Friday 20 September 2013
Reich and Mesmer - Orgonomy Journal Notes
Been looking through my Reich bibliography and rereading the articles on Mesmer and Reich. As the journals are not that easy to get hold of I thought I would post some notes here...
Numbered Notes from my Reich Biblio on Mesmer and Reich, see here for full Biblio:
35)
Other devices using ORAC (orgone accumulator) type layering:-
·
Atomic
Piles (carbon/uranium)
·
Leydon
Jars (glass/metal)
·
Mesmer's
Baquet (charged water/stones/metal)
See also Demeo's notes on celestial influences upon above devices.
36)
Author notes that Mesmer, who
discovered many aspects of life energy, was
also awareof muscular armouring.
37)
Mesmer’s human dor-buster (healing hand-passes with
one foot in a water-bucket, transforming the healer’s body into an ‘orgone’
conduit similar to Reich’s medical dor-buster). A DOR-buster is a tube device
grounded into flowing water for removing negative orgone from an organism.
38)
Attack on animal magnetism
in France was very similar to that on orgonomy (although that was in a later
century and in the USA).
- There
was a refusal to honestly examine the evidence (Mesmer pleaded for a commission). (The FDA’s examination of
Reich’s work was profoundly dishonest and unscientific).
- Mesmer
himself was excluded from any ‘investigations’. (Reich was also excluded
from the FDA ‘investigations’ and the FDA scientists did not read his work
or try and repeat his experiments).
- Attacks
on Mesmer were initiated by someone posing as a friend. (The attack on
Reich was initiated by a journalist posing as friendly toward orgonomy).
- Quack
official investigation followed which simply pronounced animal magnetism doesn’t exist. (The
FDA simply pronounced orgone doesn’t exist without honest scientific proof
and without repeating his actual experiments).
- Enormous
effort was expended denouncing animal magnetism world-wide (very expensive
printed report circulated widely. (The FDA spent the majority of its budget
for part of the 1950s persecuting one doctor and to destroy just 300
orgone boxes).
1020)
Mesmer's 'bacquet' was a large wooden tub in which bottles fillled
with water or iron fillings were placed. The water had been 'magnetised' or
healed. Attached to the bottles were metallic rods and flexible cords which were held by the persons
surrounding the bacquet. Their free hand would be connected to each other. Thus
the bacquet transmitted energy and connected energy at the same time using metal's ability to transmit life-energy. It has
aspects of both the Medical Dorbuster and the ORAC (ORAC is short for Orgone
Accumulator Cabinet).
Both men began by examining biological functions and
electricity/magnetism but concluded that there was an additional force to
electromagnetism at work in organisms and the environment. Mesmer's work has
the following in common with the orgonomic view -
A
universal fluid can be intensified and it;
Fills all
space
Penetrates
all matter
Can be
stored or conducted
Is
associated with the nervous system
Mesmer’s
bacquet can be charged with the universal fluid (Reich’s ORAC does the same).
A loss of
muscular irritablity (Mesmer) is similar to muscle armouring (Reich)
Sudden
release of this muscular holding and energy blockage (irritability/armouring)
leads to profound crisis and then healing (and can need management due to possible
medical crisis).
Health is
wholeness.
Both
views argue for the unhindered development of children
Some
specific quotes:
‘Emotional
Plague v. Animal Magnetism’, Jerome Eden (1967) Journal of Orgonomy Vol1 Num1&2
pp172)
From pp175:
“Grounded as he was in his postulation of a universal fluid, Mesmer
considered every disease process to be nothing more than a disturbance or disequilibrium of the universal fluid of the body.
In searching for the cause of this disequilibrium, he arrived at the conclusion
that it was always the muscular fibre which, being either chronically
contracted or expanded (or because of its inability to expand or contract at
all), impeded the normal flow of the universal fluid. Mesmer therefore sought
for the means whereby 1) the patient’s universal fluid might be increased
sufficiently so that it could ‘overthrow the cause of the malady,’ or 2) the
impeding muscular fibre might be restored to its normal condition of
elasticity.”
From pp178:
“In order to accommodate the scores of patients who flocked daily to
his clinic, Mesmer invented a simple structure for ‘accumulating’ the universal
fluid and applying it directly to several patients simultaneously. He called
this device a ‘baquet’ or tub. Essentially, it consisted of a large, covered
wooden tub filled with glass bottles. In the ‘wet’ baquet,’ the bottles were
filled with water and iron filings. Small iron rods protruded through the cork
of each bottle. These small iron rods were connected by larger, flexible iron
rods that emerged through holes in the lid of the baquet. The flexible rods
were held by the encircling patients. Also, in the wet baquet, water and iron
filings were added to the tub itself. In the ‘dry baquet,’ sand and iron
filings were used. Individual baquets, or ‘magnetic boxes,’ were constructed for
patients who were not ambulatory.
Those familiar with Wilhelm Reich’s discovery of orgone energy and his
invention of the orgone energy accumulator and the DOR—buster can readily
understand the basic similarities here.”
From pp180:
The quack ‘investigation’ of Mesmer:-
“Twenty thousand copies of this voluminous report were printed and
distributed throughout the world. (This in the days of hand typesetting and
hand press demonstrates the incredible effort employed to obliterate a ‘non-existent’
discovery.) At the same time, however, a secret report was drawn up by the
commission and presented to Louis XVI-its subject; the dangerous moral aspects of animal magnetism.”
‘Mesmer,
Reich and the Living Process’, Marc Shapiro (1965) The Creative Process, Vol4,
Num2.
From
pp64:
‘The great common discovery underlying the work of Mesmer and Reich is
PULSATION. Pulsation is the main action (called intensification and remission
by Mesmer, expansion and contraction by Reich) of what Mesmer called the ‘Universal
Fluid.’ This Universal Fluid, like Reich’s orgone energy, filled all space and
was the agency of all movement.’
From
pp65:
‘This question brings us to the most remarkable and significant
relation of Mesmer’s work to Reich’s, for Mesmer discovered muscular armouring.’
‘This could be seen in breathing which Mesmer called the ‘universal
expression’ of the Fluid.’
‘However, Mesmer not only passed his hands over the body; he actually
pressed the chronically disturbed muscles in order to bring them back to irritability.’
(My note: this is the same process as in the physical side of orgone
psychotherapy: pressing on the stuck muscle whilst breathing).
From
pp66:
‘The muscular spasms, the strange sensations of movement within the
organism, the trembling and the convulsive movements are all typical effects
observed within orgone therapy. It goes without saying that this is not all of
what happens in orgone therapy – but neither, I believe, does it fully describe
Mesmer’s treatment. Mesmer describes people sitting around the famous bacquet
having sudden outbreaks of laughter, anger or weeping. From the descriptions of
Mesmer by his contempories, from his writings and from his general attitude
toward life as shown in these writings, I feel he had a strong sense of contact
with the patients he was treating, a sense of his own moving energy mingling
with theirs.’
From pp67:
‘Mesmer and Reich both believed that the functions of the living
organism were the expression of a cosmic process. Mesmer stated what amounts to
an early view of self-regulation.’ (My note: Reich believed that healthy
children were not truly known in our armoured, sick society but that we should
attempt to study what health in childhood constitutes and that children should
be free to express themselves safely without undue interference from adults,
apart from loving care. Mesmer believed children should be ‘unimpeded’ and
would naturally find his own ‘development and instruction’ if given freedom to
express movement. Like Reich he believed children should be surrounded by
children of their own age without overt adult interference and that infants
should be immersed in the contact of their mothers. Both believed education
should follow natural principles and follow the child. Mesmer believed children
should not be taught words till later in childhood (6 or 7) according to this
article.
Article also notes that both men believed that the true perception of
the universal force was often hidden within distortions of mysticism and
religion but not that these things are in themselves untrue. Reich would say
that ‘everyone is right in some way’.
From pp69:
Table of Correspondences
Mesmer –
1. Universal
Fluid, (Intensification and Remission, Fills All Space, Penetrates All
Matter, Carried by Nerves, Can Be Stored, Conducted)
2. Baquet,
(Becomes charged with universal energy, employed therapeutically).
3. Loss
of Muscular Irritability
4. Health
is Wholeness
5. Unhindered
Development of Children
Reich –
1. Orgone
Energy, (Expansion and Contraction, Fills All Space, Penetrates All Matter,
Carried by Nerves, Can Be Stored, Conducted).
2. Orgone
Energy Accumulator, (Becomes charged with universal energy,
employed therapeutically).
3. Armouring
4. Health
is Wholeness
5. Self-regulation
An extra note that has just reminded itself to me is the following: both Mesmer and Reich used iron or iron-based metal to attract the 'force' and water to 'ground' it. Also Oriental medicine uses iron-based metal (steel needles) to attract or disperse qi. It is not a coincidence because it is simply the same 'force' functioning in similar ways...
An extra note that has just reminded itself to me is the following: both Mesmer and Reich used iron or iron-based metal to attract the 'force' and water to 'ground' it. Also Oriental medicine uses iron-based metal (steel needles) to attract or disperse qi. It is not a coincidence because it is simply the same 'force' functioning in similar ways...
One of Mesmer's Original Baquets
A Medical DOR-Buster
(tubes grounded into moving water)
An Orgone Accumulator Cabinet
My Orgone Cabinet
Saturday 14 September 2013
Micro-chloridians (or microchloridians) and Bions...in search of the 'real thing'
I have talked about Star Wars and George Lucas having inside information and the connections between Reich, Mesmer, actual life-force and what George Lucas says. I was just watching Lego Star wars and found the proper name of the biological entity in Star Wars - midi-chlorians - they are exactly the same thing as Reich's bions only they have been given a 'mass consciousness' in the film, which is quite possible in my view. Reich discovered orgone through watching and measuring the life-force field given off by bions. They are about 2-8 microns in size, usually a blue spherical shape and have a strong force-field unless there is illness. They are the link between non-life and life. Here is a link from 'wookiepedia' and then a link for the 'real' thing, the first picture is from Star Wars, the second is the 'real' bion....http://starwars.wikia.com/wiki/Midi-chlorian
real thing... http://www.orgonelab.org/DeMeoBionsColor.pdf
real thing... http://www.orgonelab.org/DeMeoBionsColor.pdf
Monday 9 September 2013
Darwinism, Another Fairy-Tale?
Darwin said, ‘Natura non facit saltum’ : nature takes no
leaps. Except it does….
Problems with Darwinism and gradual evolution:
1. Primordial
Soup: The actual
chemical content of the ‘primordial soup’ as currently considered could not
have given birth even to amino acids (contrary to earlier experiments which
used the wrong chemicals apparently) let alone a fully-fledged cell, which is a
bit like a Concorde happening by accident. To randomly produce a protein
molecule or the gene to produce it would be a probabilistic impossibility (one
chance in 10 with a 125 zeros after it).
2. Cambrian
Explosion: we had jellyfish, sponges and worms for billions of years
and then ‘boom’ virtually all the ‘families’ of animals (phyla) appeared
suddenly in the fossil record fully formed. Darwin admitted that the Cambrian
explosion went against his theory but felt confident future discoveries would vindicate
him. They haven’t. Darwin remains unvindicated yet this does not bother the
mainstream. This situation alone is enough to disprove gradual evolution
according to Darwin himself. There is also no experimental evidence to support
the view that there were gradual changes within the genetics structure which
took place but then expressed themselves suddenly – why would natural selection
or gradual evolution affect a process in the DNA that had no visible effects
for billions of years? The hidden genetics hypothesis is completely
unsubstantiated experimentally. Clutching at straws comes to mind.
3. Embryology: Darwin
claimed that because early embryo’s look similar this is evidence of common
ancestry. However the early embryo diagrams by Haeckel were doctored (this was
known in 1860 yet the diagrams were still being used in 1990s!). Most embryos are not similar in their early
stages.
4. Homology: similar
features in different animals. The developmental pathway theory of evolution
(tree of life) and common gene pathways theory have both failed experimentally
(for example genes for the eyes can be
swapped between frogs and flies yet still the right eye for each animal
develops). Developmental pathway and gene pathway theories cannot therefore be
used to validate Darwinism. Homology itself is not proof of Darwinism as it can
also be used to argue for Intelligent Design.
5. ‘Gills’ in non-fish
mammal embryos: could be just neck creases in the womb.
6. Missing
Links: The
archeopertyx is simply an extinct bird, it is not a missing link as it was from
the wrong era to link reptiles and birds. There are little or no ‘missing
links’. We are supposed to accept on faith that birds descended from dinosaurs
but this is not proved. If Darwinism was correct the fossil record should be
jammed packed with ‘missing links’ and intermediate forms. It is not. Therefore
gradual evolution from species to species is not supported (macro-evolution).
Micro-evolution, (changes within a species), is generally agreed as we can all
see it happen. (Update - I recently read about how the gradualism of our own evolution does not stack up either. Our nearest hominid pre-human, is dozens of 'missing links' away from us. What are described as 'pre-human' are essentially upright apes. The difference between them and modern man is an immense leap of massive changes in bone density, skeleton and skull shape. Gradualism does not explain this process. The changes between Neanderthal and modern human are equally massive and sudden. Our matriarchal DNA also indicates we are a very young species - the exact opposite of what Darwin's theories would predict if we 'gradually' emerged).
7. Java Man:
Half-ape/half-man from 1891 was a ‘skullcap, a femur, three teeth and a lot of
imagination’.
8. Irreducibly
Complex Systems: there are many biological systems such as bacterial
flagella (complex tail propellers with ingenious super-powered micro-engines)
which cannot be reduced to simpler systems. If you take one part away from the
complex whole it no longer functions. Most scientists are at a loss to describe
how gradual selection can create irreducibly complex systems, of which there
are many.
9. The cell itself is so
complex that many leading biologists have all but given up the ‘chance’
hypothesis. Many scientists now side with intelligent design, often changing
their position from a previously held view of gradualist evolution as such a
view is not compatible with the evidence.
10. Molecules: How
can gradual evolution work at the molecular level where there is no organism to
be affected by natural selection? Darwinism fails to explain how non-life can
organise to produce life.
11. DNA: There
is no known chemical or physical process which would bring the first DNA or RNA
sequence together into formation. The power to do so would need to come from
outside the molecule itself. (Life-force may be capable of doing this but
life-force is not known to most scientists of either intelligent design,
evolutionist or creationist persuasions).
12. Self-organising
processes known to mainstream science produce mechanical order, such as
repetitive sequences of crystals but life itself is a different kind of order (an
irregular complexity capable of producing new information). However life-force
sciences observe that irregular complexity does spontaneously arise in the form
of the life-vesicle termed the bion by Reich or other pre-cellular forms
discovered by others. The proto-cellular form bions can be created by cooking
organic matter at high temperature. They display life-like characteristics
though they are much less complex than a cell. Here are bions emerging from a
super-sterile, autoclaved hay infusion: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cXickkE3aDU
Here are some quotes from molecular biologists such as Dr
Wells:
‘Darwinism is merely materialist philosophy masquerading as
science'
‘Darwinian evolution is bankrupt.’
The above notes were taken from or were inspired by Lee Stroebel's book 'Case for a Creator', the chapter on Darwinism, a very enjoyable account of a journalist's investigation of the mainstream scientific evidence for a creator. My own views differ quite a bit from Strobel's because he is not aware of life-force, which changes the ball game once again. A good book too which pulls apart the 'religion' of modern blind science is this by the scientist who has worked on the 'morphic field' theory, Dr Sheldrake, The Science Delusion
The above notes were taken from or were inspired by Lee Stroebel's book 'Case for a Creator', the chapter on Darwinism, a very enjoyable account of a journalist's investigation of the mainstream scientific evidence for a creator. My own views differ quite a bit from Strobel's because he is not aware of life-force, which changes the ball game once again. A good book too which pulls apart the 'religion' of modern blind science is this by the scientist who has worked on the 'morphic field' theory, Dr Sheldrake, The Science Delusion
Also, in politics it should be remembered, Darwinism is absolutely fascist. No single theory has done more to philosophically support fascism in both economics and sociology than Charlie's contribution. Think Eugenics, think Rockefellers, think Nazism, think mechanical biology - all rely on Darwin's theories as background support and validation. The strong crush the weak, there is no spiritual higher powers, everything has a mechanical cause, there is only mechanics and anything approaching a God or a spiritual perspective is redundant.
Sunday 1 September 2013
Creationism, Mainstream science and the Big Bang - Religion in Disguise!
What unites radical right wing religious fundamentalists and left wing ideological atheists? both believe that the universe was created out of nothing and that the universe has no background life-force, is essentially empty and mechanical, apart from 'mind' or 'God'....but the science the religious right and the left atheists both claim is wrong...there is a dynamic aether that the Victorians believed in, there is a life-force as Mesmer and Reich stated and the Big Bang (creationism in disguise) is not actually supported by the evidence...or at least there would be a big debate if all the info were acknowledged. This astrophysicist was banned from using American telescopes...they didn't like what he was finding, so he had to go to Germany..in a nutshell, the red shift is the way light changes as objects move away, it is used to argue that the universe is expanding after a Big Bang...but...the red shift is misinterpreted and uneven, young and old galaxies are next to each other and giving birth to each other, also the background noise of the universe could be from dark matter/orgone not the leftover from the Big Bang..anyhow see below...I've also been reading about how science can be argued to support the theistic viewpoint. Much of it I agree with but if you include the life-force you get a very different picture than the one many subscribe to, closer to the Native people's views. Anyway a short synopsis of the critique on darwinism, a theory in total disarray, to follow from that reading before too long...
http://www.amazon.co.uk/Seeing-Red-Redshifts-Cosmology-Academic/dp/0968368905/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1378073520&sr=8-1&keywords=halton+arp
http://www.amazon.co.uk/Seeing-Red-Redshifts-Cosmology-Academic/dp/0968368905/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1378073520&sr=8-1&keywords=halton+arp
Just to add another thought - the other argument for the Big Bang and a created universe is the Second Law of Thermodynamics - that the universe's entropy (disorder) is always increasing. That matter is 'unwinding' toward a heat death (and that therefore, working backwards, the universe had a beginning at a finite point). This law is overturned by the existence of the orgone accumulator - it is negatively entropic, creating heat, energy without any observed input (what it is called the thermal anomaly or TO-T in orgonomy).
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)